Scientists have accused the UK government of “misrepresenting” the Climate Change Committee (CCC) by wrongly claiming it said we would need a quarter of our energy to come from fossil fuels by 2050.
In order to justify signing off new oil and gas licences in the North Sea, ministers have said the country will still require a quarter of its energy to come from gas in 2050, the year the UK is supposed to meet net zero.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) is reported to have said that this figure comes from the CCC, the government’s statutory advisory body, which has strongly advised against licensing new fossil fuels.
Claire Coutinho, the energy security and net zero secretary, said recently: “We will not play politics with our energy security. Even the independent CCC has said that in 2050, we will need oil and gas for a quarter of our energy.”
DESNZ confirmed to the Guardian that the figure often cited by the department came from the CCC’s sixth carbon budget.
Read also: Building firms to Sunak: Undoing green policies will hit housing investment
When asked for its methodology – how it arrived at this figure from the CCC’s data – a department spokesperson did not return a request for comment. A spokesperson for the CCC said: “The data is used from our sixth carbon budget but they used their own calculation to get to that.” It is understood the committee does not endorse the 25% figure.
On his part, Prof Michael Grubb, from University College London, said: “I cannot find any credible basis for the government’s claim – not in the CCC analysis, nor in any serious analysis of net zero scenarios.
“The government must explain where it got this claim from and – speaking as a former member of the CCC – I’d ask specifically for the government to justify its reference to CCC analysis. The fiscal fiasco last year showed the dangers of the government withholding rigorous analytic advice from its own official channels – major misrepresentation, if this is what it is, is just as bad, if not worse.”
Also reacting, Prof Sam Fankhauser, from the Smith School at the University of Oxford, said: “I have now looked at the sixth carbon budget advice and could not find an explicit reference to oil and gas use in 2050. So the 25% figure must have been derived indirectly. Hard to know how this was done.
Story was adapted from the Guardian.
