The mother of a nine-year-old girl who reportedly became the first person in the UK to have air pollution cited on their death certificate has launched a high court claim against the government.
According to reports, Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah is suing three government departments for compensation for personal injury arising from the illness and premature death of her daughter Ella. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Department for Transport and the Department of Health and Social Care have all been named as defendants in the claim.
Her lawyers said that she hoped the action would further her broader campaign to establish the โright to clean airโ.
Ella Kissi-Debrah, who is from south-east London, had a fatal asthma attack in 2013 after being exposed to excessive air pollution. In an inquest in 2020, a coroner ruled that air pollution had โmade a material contributionโ to her death.
Ravi Mehta, the barrister instructed by Hodge Jones & Allen, the law firm representing the family, said in written arguments presented to the court: โWhile this claim does include a claim for damages, it is not about money. Rather, the focus of the claim is about seeking vindication for the death of Ella, a child.โ
Read also: Report: Nuclear power output expected to break global records in 2025
Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah spent years investigating potential links between Ellaโs death and air pollution, particularly unlawful levels of nitrogen dioxide caused by traffic.
The family lived approximately 25 metres from the busy South Circular and Ella regularly walked by it on her way to and from school. She developed asthma shortly before her seventh birthday and over the next two years was admitted to hospital 27 times after repeated seizures. She had the fatal asthma attack a few weeks after her ninth birthday.
Healthcare professionals had not identified air pollution as a potential cause of her ill health before her death. Her mother later said moving โwould have been the first thingโ the family would have done if they had known the risks that air pollution posed to Ella.
In the preliminary case management hearing, Mehta noted: โThis is no ordinary personal injury claim. It is legally complex because it is the first claim of its kind. It is factually complex because it concerns the acts and omissions of three government departments over a period of many years. The extent of the expert evidence and disclosure is likely to resemble that which would be seen in the context of a piece of group litigation.โ
Story was adapted from the Guardian.
