South Africa has said that it would miss its 2030 emissions goals, but remains committed to “net zero” by mid-century as it races to remove financial and other hurdles to rolling out renewables,
The country’s new energy minister said “We have shared with the partners as late as this morning … that we’ll not be able to meet those targets by 2030, highly unlikely,” Ramokgopa said in an interview with Reuters in his office in Pretoria.
But he added that, “if you use a long horizon of 2050, we will not move (from) that,”.
Under the Paris Climate Accords, South Africa was committed to cutting emissions to between 350 and 420 million tonnes by 2030, from 442 million tonnes in 2020, on the way to net zero.
Read also: Plan to turn sewage waste into drinking water branded a โwhite elephantโ
Ramokgopa said that from next week he would also meet with lenders and private power providers to hear their “frustrations” at project delays, with a view to accelerating investment into green energy and catching up on its climate commitments.
Owing to its heavy reliance on coal for electricity, South Africa is the world’s most carbon-intensive major economy and its 15th biggest greenhouse gas emitter – higher than France, Italy or Turkey.
After years of power cuts, South Africa had to prioritise energy security by boosting output from coal-fire power stations, Ramokgopa said.
“But we are committed over a (longer) period of time and we are able to say to them, this is how we’ll achieve it,” he said, referring rich nations including the United States and several European countries that are offering $12 billion in funding, mostly loans, towards South Africa’s energy transition.
A spokesperson from the embassy of France, one of the partners, said that it was not in a position to comment at this stage. Other donors did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Many nations, including some of the rich ones lending to South Africa, look unlikely to hit their 2030 targets.
He said that the new policies would speed things up included removing bureaucratic hurdles to existing private tenders, expropriating land from farmers holding up the power grid buildout, and re-pricing deals with power providers that failed to close after the Ukraine war jacked up component prices.
Story was adapted from Reuters.
